Discussion:
February sweeps and the continuing ghettoization of scifi
(too old to reply)
Hugh Jass
2013-02-23 03:06:24 UTC
Permalink
I don't know what's replacing Nielsen ratings as the primary way network
shows' revenue is determined, but clearly something has, as the networks
clearly do not give a shit about viewership during sweeps periods anymore.

Witness tonight's "lineup", if I may use that term loosely. CSI:NY is a
rerun, smack dab in the middle of sweeps. One of the top shows on TV. A
rerun. Even a couple of years ago they wouldn't have dared.

And then there's the continuing absence of Grimm on NBC. It disappeared for
Christmas ... and never came back. Rumor has it it has *not* been canceled,
but week after week goes by and no Grimm. Not even a rerun. If this streak
continues for one more week, there won't have been any throughout the
entire February ratings sweep, which a decade ago would have meant Grimm
didn't have any data with which to demand good advertising rates until the
end of May sweeps, by which time it would have ended for the summer. It
would have been suicide for the show, in other words.

Now that doesn't prove that sweeps-based advertising rates aren't
important; the continuing ghettoization of scifi means it's 100% plausible
that NBC has decided to strangle Grimm in the cradle by purposely
sabotaging its profitability, then using that as an excuse to cancel it.
After all they infamously did exactly that with the original Star Trek way
back in the seventies. But they are being awfully blatant about it if so.
They'd ALREADY shuffled it off to Friday nights, ala Star Trek, and then to
yank it completely off the air through an entire sweeps period ON TOP OF
THAT?

The other possibility is that there is another revenue source that's
beginning to eclipse ones that depend on getting good ratings during sweeps
months. I'm not sure what that might be, though, that wouldn't also be hurt
by the show's lengthy absence. Disappearing the show for months at a time
won't exactly drum up DVD sales, for example, and no new episodes for
months means nothing new to sell to streaming services.

Does anybody know what it might be that is making sweeps less relevant? Are
they simply trying to kill Grimm? Could CBS even be trying to kill CSI:NY?
RichA
2013-02-23 03:29:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hugh Jass
Does anybody know what it might be that is making sweeps less relevant? Are
they simply trying to kill Grimm? Could CBS even be trying to kill CSI:NY?
17 eps as a season, it's days are numbered.
Barry Margolin
2013-02-23 05:00:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hugh Jass
I don't know what's replacing Nielsen ratings as the primary way network
shows' revenue is determined, but clearly something has, as the networks
clearly do not give a shit about viewership during sweeps periods anymore.
Witness tonight's "lineup", if I may use that term loosely. CSI:NY is a
rerun, smack dab in the middle of sweeps. One of the top shows on TV. A
rerun. Even a couple of years ago they wouldn't have dared.
It's not a rerun. In fact, it's the season finale. There's been
discussion of this in the thread about Hill Harper moving to "Covert
Affairs", as his contract with CSI:NY is up and he's not renewing it.
Post by Hugh Jass
And then there's the continuing absence of Grimm on NBC. It disappeared for
Christmas ... and never came back. Rumor has it it has *not* been canceled,
but week after week goes by and no Grimm. Not even a rerun. If this streak
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?

Bye Seamus....
--
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA
Hugh Jass
2013-02-23 05:36:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Barry Margolin
Post by Hugh Jass
I don't know what's replacing Nielsen ratings as the primary way network
shows' revenue is determined, but clearly something has, as the networks
clearly do not give a shit about viewership during sweeps periods anymore.
Witness tonight's "lineup", if I may use that term loosely. CSI:NY is a
rerun, smack dab in the middle of sweeps. One of the top shows on TV. A
rerun. Even a couple of years ago they wouldn't have dared.
It's not a rerun.
Plot synopsis in the guide said "In the Season 9 finale ...", though it's
the middle of February, and went on to sound very familiar.

And I caught the ending. Mac proposed to Christine. Didn't I see them
celebrating their anniversary with a rooftop dinner a couple of episodes or
so ago?
Post by Barry Margolin
In fact, it's the season finale.
It's February, not May, and it's a long-running veteran show, not some
rookie show that might conceivably have failed to get its back nine.
Post by Barry Margolin
There's been discussion of this in the thread about Hill Harper
moving to "Covert Affairs", as his contract with CSI:NY is up
and he's not renewing it.
I don't read the celebrity-gossip threads, as they don't interest me.

Wouldn't a contract have been "up" at a season boundary, such as the end of
May?
Post by Barry Margolin
Post by Hugh Jass
And then there's the continuing absence of Grimm on NBC. It disappeared for
Christmas ... and never came back. Rumor has it it has *not* been canceled,
but week after week goes by and no Grimm. Not even a rerun. If this streak
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
Bye Seamus....
Post by Hugh Jass
Does anybody know what it might be that is making sweeps less relevant? Are
they simply trying to kill Grimm? Could CBS even be trying to kill CSI:NY?
And I'm not Seamus.
erilar
2013-02-23 18:58:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
--
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist
Jim G.
2013-02-25 20:43:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
shawn
2013-02-25 21:56:54 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:17 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
Yes, I feel certain they will wrap up that storyline soon.
Unfortunately we will have to deal with the infatuation that Juliet
and Nick's boss are still feeling for each other. Hopefully that won't
take too long since it seems that the facts behind it are coming out.
Jim G.
2013-02-27 20:54:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:17 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
Yes, I feel certain they will wrap up that storyline soon.
Unfortunately we will have to deal with the infatuation that Juliet
and Nick's boss are still feeling for each other. Hopefully that won't
take too long since it seems that the facts behind it are coming out.
You think that the infatuation will remain after Juliet snaps out of the
spell? For a viewer like me who hates the soapy stuff, that would really
suck. And Nick probably wouldn't like it, either.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
shawn
2013-02-27 23:43:03 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:54:48 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:17 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
Yes, I feel certain they will wrap up that storyline soon.
Unfortunately we will have to deal with the infatuation that Juliet
and Nick's boss are still feeling for each other. Hopefully that won't
take too long since it seems that the facts behind it are coming out.
You think that the infatuation will remain after Juliet snaps out of the
spell? For a viewer like me who hates the soapy stuff, that would really
suck. And Nick probably wouldn't like it, either.
No, I just meant that we will have to deal with that infatuation for a
few more episodes before she snaps out of the spell. After that
happens I expect all we will get is awkward silence if the two meet
but no more than that.
Jim G.
2013-02-28 20:21:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:54:48 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:17 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
Yes, I feel certain they will wrap up that storyline soon.
Unfortunately we will have to deal with the infatuation that Juliet
and Nick's boss are still feeling for each other. Hopefully that won't
take too long since it seems that the facts behind it are coming out.
You think that the infatuation will remain after Juliet snaps out of the
spell? For a viewer like me who hates the soapy stuff, that would really
suck. And Nick probably wouldn't like it, either.
No, I just meant that we will have to deal with that infatuation for a
few more episodes before she snaps out of the spell. After that
happens I expect all we will get is awkward silence if the two meet
but no more than that.
And hopefully the writers won't spend episode after episode with Nick
and Juliet "exploring" their feelings for each other in the aftermath,
or whatnot. Get 'em back together quickly. Break 'em up quickly. I don't
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
all, whether she's still with Nick or not. The current three musketeers
need a female touch, after all.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
shawn
2013-02-28 22:16:18 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:21:52 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:54:48 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:17 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
Yes, I feel certain they will wrap up that storyline soon.
Unfortunately we will have to deal with the infatuation that Juliet
and Nick's boss are still feeling for each other. Hopefully that won't
take too long since it seems that the facts behind it are coming out.
You think that the infatuation will remain after Juliet snaps out of the
spell? For a viewer like me who hates the soapy stuff, that would really
suck. And Nick probably wouldn't like it, either.
No, I just meant that we will have to deal with that infatuation for a
few more episodes before she snaps out of the spell. After that
happens I expect all we will get is awkward silence if the two meet
but no more than that.
And hopefully the writers won't spend episode after episode with Nick
and Juliet "exploring" their feelings for each other in the aftermath,
or whatnot. Get 'em back together quickly. Break 'em up quickly. I don't
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
all, whether she's still with Nick or not. The current three musketeers
need a female touch, after all.
I'll be shocked if they don't bring Juliet in on the secret by the end
of the season. I suspect they will keep her and Nick together but
either way I expect her to be brought in on the secret before long.
Heck, even this sudden infatuation with Nick's boss should be raising
questions in her mind. I do agree that whatever they are going to do
they need to do quickly. This isn't the sort of show that works as a
soap opera.
Jim G.
2013-03-04 20:33:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:21:52 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:54:48 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:17 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by erilar
Post by Barry Margolin
Rumor has always been that it would come back in late March. Is your
calendar broken?
I saw a Grimm ad. Early March. I quit watching it because I got so sick
of Juliet's selective amnesia and fixation on Nick's boss, and according
to the ad, it continues, so I don't intend to watch.
Yeah, the Juliet storyline is admittedly beyond the tedious stage, but
there's so much other good stuff with this show that I'm willing to suck
it up on that front. But hopefully they'll wrap up that silliness in the
second half of season two. There have already been indications that
she's snapping out of it, IIRC.
Yes, I feel certain they will wrap up that storyline soon.
Unfortunately we will have to deal with the infatuation that Juliet
and Nick's boss are still feeling for each other. Hopefully that won't
take too long since it seems that the facts behind it are coming out.
You think that the infatuation will remain after Juliet snaps out of the
spell? For a viewer like me who hates the soapy stuff, that would really
suck. And Nick probably wouldn't like it, either.
No, I just meant that we will have to deal with that infatuation for a
few more episodes before she snaps out of the spell. After that
happens I expect all we will get is awkward silence if the two meet
but no more than that.
And hopefully the writers won't spend episode after episode with Nick
and Juliet "exploring" their feelings for each other in the aftermath,
or whatnot. Get 'em back together quickly. Break 'em up quickly. I don't
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
all, whether she's still with Nick or not. The current three musketeers
need a female touch, after all.
I'll be shocked if they don't bring Juliet in on the secret by the end
of the season.
I hope that you're right.
Post by shawn
I suspect they will keep her and Nick together
I agree. But then again, this *is* NBC, and if they think that the soapy
stuff will keep the non-skiffy fans coming back...
Post by shawn
but
either way I expect her to be brought in on the secret before long.
Again, I hope that you're right.
Post by shawn
Heck, even this sudden infatuation with Nick's boss should be raising
questions in her mind.
Yeah, she's not stupid, and now that she's got *most* of her faculties
back, she should be busy processing things...
Post by shawn
I do agree that whatever they are going to do
they need to do quickly. This isn't the sort of show that works as a
soap opera.
Amen. And I can only hope that someone is beating this point into the
NBC suited pinheads on a daily basis.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Jonathan Wilson
2013-03-01 02:05:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim G.
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
I have seen far too many potentially good TV series ruined when the
producers started adding too much "soap" and not enough hard drama or
action (Jericho being one example I can think of)
Jim G.
2013-03-04 20:33:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jonathan Wilson
Post by Jim G.
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
I have seen far too many potentially good TV series ruined when the
producers started adding too much "soap" and not enough hard drama or
action (Jericho being one example I can think of)
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
shawn
2013-03-04 23:15:54 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Jonathan Wilson
Post by Jim G.
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
I have seen far too many potentially good TV series ruined when the
producers started adding too much "soap" and not enough hard drama or
action (Jericho being one example I can think of)
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
See "Revolution" as an example.
Jim G.
2013-03-06 20:50:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Jonathan Wilson
Post by Jim G.
care either way. Just be done with it and move on to the non-soapy
stuff. Ideally, I'd like to see Juliet in on the secret once and for
I have seen far too many potentially good TV series ruined when the
producers started adding too much "soap" and not enough hard drama or
action (Jericho being one example I can think of)
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
See "Revolution" as an example.
Do I have to?
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-09 16:09:51 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ You can't spell 'disgust' without
/ / 'SGU' - Anim8rFSK
anim8rFSK
2013-03-09 18:07:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ You can't spell 'disgust' without
/ / 'SGU' - Anim8rFSK
Merrick! Yay! :)
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
Adam H. Kerman
2013-03-10 05:54:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
anim8rFSK
2013-03-10 13:10:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
shawn
2013-03-10 14:15:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
Then don't look at this:
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-photoshoot-video
anim8rFSK
2013-03-10 15:25:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-
photoshoot-video
rowr!
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
Murdoc
2013-03-10 22:09:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-photoshoot-video
480p?! What the fuh? This ain't the freaking nineties. We demand HDTV!!!1
Your Name
2013-03-11 00:31:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Murdoc
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-photoshoot-video
Post by Murdoc
480p?! What the fuh? This ain't the freaking nineties. We demand HDTV!!!1
HDTV?! What the fuh? This ain't the freaking noughties. We demand Retina
display quality!!!! ;-)
Jim G.
2013-03-11 22:01:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-photoshoot-video
Thank you for that. I owe you a beer, or something. :)
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Daniel47@teranews.com
2013-03-13 10:37:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-photoshoot-video
Thank you for that. I owe you a beer, or something. :)
Did you notice, over in the "Summer Glau Pop Quiz" section:-

Summer Glau
What was here first role on TV?

I've got no idea what "here" first appeared on T.V. in ..... nor do I
know what *her* first role was!!

Daniel
anim8rFSK
2013-03-13 15:41:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@teranews.com
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-f
hm-photoshoot-video
Thank you for that. I owe you a beer, or something. :)
Did you notice, over in the "Summer Glau Pop Quiz" section:-
Summer Glau
What was here first role on TV?
I've got no idea what "here" first appeared on T.V. in ..... nor do I
know what *her* first role was!!
Daniel
That's not a real toughy; she had a bit on ANGEL and moved on to FIREFLY.
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
Your Name
2013-03-13 20:15:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by ***@teranews.com
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
Animal House!
I'm only 13 ...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/summer-glau/videos/24670683/title/summer-glau-fhm-photoshoot-video
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by ***@teranews.com
Post by Jim G.
Thank you for that. I owe you a beer, or something. :)
Did you notice, over in the "Summer Glau Pop Quiz" section:-
Summer Glau
What was here first role on TV?
I've got no idea what "here" first appeared on T.V. in ..... nor do I
know what *her* first role was!!
That's not a real toughy; she had a bit on ANGEL and moved on to FIREFLY.
Her first appearance (rather than role) on TV was probably some advert. :-)
Jim G.
2013-03-11 22:01:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
As a straight guy, I can assure you that that ploy only worked if the
girl in question *always* did that. But the girls who would even
*consider* doing that were all too stupid to realize that consistency
was important, so they'd go from an A cup to a B or C cup every once in
a while, which was always good for a laugh.

And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
anim8rFSK
2013-03-11 23:21:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
As a straight guy, I can assure you that that ploy only worked if the
girl in question *always* did that. But the girls who would even
*consider* doing that were all too stupid to realize that consistency
was important, so they'd go from an A cup to a B or C cup every once in
a while, which was always good for a laugh.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
Jim G.
2013-03-12 19:21:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by anim8rFSK
Post by Jim G.
Post by shawn
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:33:24 -0600, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Soap is easy. Soap is padding. Soap is easy padding. Anyone who can
string together nouns and verbs can write soap. That's why it's so
common. But common isn't necessarily good, and padding is almost always
bad.
Yes indeed.. It's like tissues in a woman's bra. Always a
disappointment for the straight man who thought he was going to be
getting more than a handful...
As a straight guy, I can assure you that that ploy only worked if the
girl in question *always* did that. But the girls who would even
*consider* doing that were all too stupid to realize that consistency
was important, so they'd go from an A cup to a B or C cup every once in
a while, which was always good for a laugh.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-14 20:03:20 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:21:10 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
After the Summer Glau pollution of the thread, I'm afraid that
it's going to take a lot more than a simple reminder of where he last
left his mind to get him to stop.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ Who are these folks and why have they
/ / stopped taking their medication?
- Captain Infinity
Murdoc
2013-03-15 02:55:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:21:10 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
After the Summer Glau pollution of the thread,
Summer Glau? Pollution? Are you off your gourd? :)
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-16 16:42:07 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:55:14 -0400, Murdoc
Post by Murdoc
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:21:10 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
After the Summer Glau pollution of the thread,
Summer Glau? Pollution? Are you off your gourd? :)
Yep.... So off my guard as to be gay.. Imagine that.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ You can't spell 'disgust' without
/ / 'SGU' - Anim8rFSK
Jim G.
2013-03-15 22:07:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:21:10 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
After the Summer Glau pollution of the thread,
"Summer Glau" and "pollution" don't belong in the same language, let
alone the same thread.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
I'm afraid that
it's going to take a lot more than a simple reminder of where he last
left his mind to get him to stop.
No worries. I'm often finding myself checking curbs for my own mind, so
I'll just keep an eye out for his while I'm at it.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-16 16:42:07 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:07:09 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:21:10 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
After the Summer Glau pollution of the thread,
They do in my dictionary... they're right next to the slang
"skillet-face".
Post by Jim G.
"Summer Glau" and "pollution" don't belong in the same language, let
alone the same thread.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
I'm afraid that
it's going to take a lot more than a simple reminder of where he last
left his mind to get him to stop.
No worries. I'm often finding myself checking curbs for my own mind, so
I'll just keep an eye out for his while I'm at it.
Pfft. Use bait. It's easier that way.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ You can't spell 'disgust' without
/ / 'SGU' - Anim8rFSK
Jim G.
2013-03-18 20:02:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:07:09 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:21:10 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by anim8rFSK
That's a particularly ugly, if likely unintended, euphemism.
Yeah, it was unintended. Get your mind out of the gutter, mister! :)
After the Summer Glau pollution of the thread,
"Summer Glau" and "pollution" don't belong in the same language, let
alone the same thread.
They do in my dictionary... they're right next to the slang
"skillet-face".
True to an extent when she was much younger. Not now, IMHO. In any case,
even when she was comparable to a skillet, she was one of the cutest
skillets out there. [And I moved your reply to where it presumably
belonged.]
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
I'm afraid that
it's going to take a lot more than a simple reminder of where he last
left his mind to get him to stop.
No worries. I'm often finding myself checking curbs for my own mind, so
I'll just keep an eye out for his while I'm at it.
Pfft. Use bait. It's easier that way.
I'm not a master baiter. Wait, let me rephrase that.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-14 20:03:20 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:01:36 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ Who are these folks and why have they
/ / stopped taking their medication?
- Captain Infinity
Jim G.
2013-03-15 22:07:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:01:36 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
Adam was supposed to call the locksmith, IIRC. He can be so
irresponsible sometimes.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-16 16:42:07 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:07:09 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:01:36 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
Adam was supposed to call the locksmith, IIRC. He can be so
irresponsible sometimes.
Given that boy's history, *this* is not surprising actually.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ You can't spell 'disgust' without
/ / 'SGU' - Anim8rFSK
Adam H. Kerman
2013-03-17 16:53:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
Adam was supposed to call the locksmith, IIRC. He can be so
irresponsible sometimes.
Given that boy's history, *this* is not surprising actually.
I do apologize.
Jim G.
2013-03-18 20:02:04 UTC
Permalink
Adam H. Kerman sent the following on Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:53:30 +0000
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
Adam was supposed to call the locksmith, IIRC. He can be so
irresponsible sometimes.
Given that boy's history, *this* is not surprising actually.
I do apologize.
Heh. For the locksmith part, right?
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Jim G.
2013-03-18 20:02:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:07:09 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:01:36 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
Adam was supposed to call the locksmith, IIRC. He can be so
irresponsible sometimes.
Given that boy's history, *this* is not surprising actually.
He was probably out drinking half the night with a bunch of Seamus
socks. It happens.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Good evening. I'm a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife." -- Madame Vastra, DOCTOR WHO
Merrick Baldelli
2013-03-20 16:31:55 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:02:04 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:07:09 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
Post by Merrick Baldelli
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:01:36 -0500, Jim G.
Post by Jim G.
And while I don't know who forgot to lock up the RAThouse last night,
it's nice to know that it wasn't someone *too* crazy who found the front
door open. Or did you break a window in the back?
No one changed the locks and my key still works.
Adam was supposed to call the locksmith, IIRC. He can be so
irresponsible sometimes.
Given that boy's history, *this* is not surprising actually.
He was probably out drinking half the night with a bunch of Seamus
socks. It happens.
And there lies the problem, eh?
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ You can't spell 'disgust' without
/ / 'SGU' - Anim8rFSK
Loading...